A couple of weeks ago I was asking on our internal lists if anybody is aware of a solution to run both IE6 and IE7 on the same machine. Since, there weren't any good news about this, I was starting to look into a different direction: virtualization. I knew about the commercial product: VMWare and heard before about a similar solution from Microsoft: VirtualPC. I was very happy to hear that the VirtualPC solution is free and I jumped to try it out.
I have used for installation the copy of my personal Windows XP Professional, but because I am cleaning/reinstalling my system on regular basis - or at least I try to - and I haven't installed it correctly the first time, the second attempt have failed because of the impossibility to activate the OS. I am wondering what I will have to do when I will try to reinstall my main system. Microsoft any ideas?
I have figured out how to fix the first image I have created so for the moment I was quite happy. I don't want to enter into details, and except the fact that the audio part is not working - which for this moment doesn't really count - I was finally the owner of a VirtualPC image with my own WindowsXP Professional copy installed (even if I am afraid I cannot use my installation copy anymore).
But, after all this work I just find out that Microsoft has released a Internet Explorer 6 Application Compatibility VPC Image, which is a working WindowsXP SP2 image prepared for a possible IE7 upgrade... and I said: wow! What a nice deed from Microsoft! But then, after downloading it and reading more about it I have find out that there is a limitation: the image is time-bombed!!! I am completely puzzled why the hell would you create a time-bombed image? Is Microsoft afraid that people will start working only with VirtualPC (which works only on Windows) with this image so that they are loosing money? I must say it again: I am completely puzzled.
4 comments:
Actually, VMWare Server (and Player) is free nowadays, and vastly superior to this VirtualPC thing (which they only made free after gettin' beaten by VMWare on so many levels).
VMWare also runs on Linux, I might add, and it's nearly flawless (been using it in production for quite a few months). I use it to run XP on my Ubuntu desktop, and to host several virtual testservers on in our data centers :)
As for why the timebomb image ? Maybe to politely force users to upgrade to Vista ? Hey, we're talking Micro$oft here. They think they can get away with anything these days.
Thanks for the comments Philip. Unfortunately, I don't think you can create images with VMWare Server, so you will still need the VMWare Workbench. However, I fully agree with you that you cannot really compair what VMWare is delivering against VirtualPC is.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
In case you didn't google this again:
http://browsers.evolt.org/?ie/32bit/standalone
I updated to IE7 and am running IE6 standalone in parallel with fairly good results. But as for any MS product, complete virtualization would be preferable :D
Vmware Server IS able to create images. Vmware Server is also free.
Vmware Player can only "play" images. It can't create them.
Post a Comment